← Back to Tools
Hunter's Toolbox — Formal Statement

On Sustainability, and What Comes Next

Published in conjunction with the sustainability notice on the main Toolbox page.

This page exists to explain, in plain language and in full detail, why a sustainability notice now appears on Hunter's Toolbox, what it means, and what happens if the situation does not change.

If you have arrived here from that notice, thank you for reading further. Everything you need to understand the full picture is on this page.

1. What sustainability means, and why it matters

Sustainability, defined simply A tool, service, or piece of infrastructure is sustainable when the resources required to keep it running: time, money, and energy, are reliably available on an ongoing basis. When those resources run out and are not replaced, the tool degrades and eventually stops existing.

When you use an app on your phone, visit a website, or use any piece of software, you are interacting with something that someone built and someone maintains. In commercial products, that maintenance is funded by subscriptions, advertising, or investment. The people doing the work get paid, and the product continues to exist.

Hunter's Toolbox is not a commercial product. It has no subscription fee, no advertising, and no investment backing. It is what is known as a free, community-built tool. Something created voluntarily, made available to everyone at no charge, and maintained by the person who built it without any guarantee of compensation.

This model works as long as the person maintaining the tool is willing and able to continue doing so. It stops working when they are not. And the most common reason a maintainer reaches that point is not laziness or indifference. It is the simple, human reality of being unable to justify continuing to invest significant time and money into something that the community it serves has not demonstrated it values enough to support.

That is where Hunter's Toolbox currently stands.

2. What Hunter's Toolbox is, and what it costs

Hunter's Toolbox is a collection of free Web3 tools built specifically for the Pool Funding community. It currently includes:

Every one of these tools was built without being asked, without any official backing, and without compensation. The total investment to date is approximately 200 hours of development, testing, documentation, and community support. At a modest professional rate of $50 per hour, significantly below market rate for this kind of work, that represents $10,000 in labor contributed entirely out of pocket.

That figure does not represent what anyone owes. It represents the scale of what has already been given freely, so that the community has something to measure against when deciding whether to contribute.

Currently, the tools are hosted on GitHub Pages at no direct financial cost. This works, but it limits what can be built and how reliably it can be delivered. To take the Toolbox further, and to ensure its long-term stability, the following infrastructure is needed:

What Why it matters Cost
Private domain A professional web address independent of GitHub's free hosting ~$5/mo
Private server (VPS) Dedicated hosting with greater reliability, control, and capacity for growth ~$50/mo
Private RPC node A dedicated connection between the tools and the blockchain — faster, more reliable, and not shared with the general public ~$40/mo
File storage for my documentation Private server hosting for all my documents used by the Pool Funding Ecosystem Variable
Gas Station Wallet A dedicated wallet to dispense enough of a gas token in cases of need $5/mo
Zoom Business license Used to host weekly community calls. Currently covered by the platform founder, may not be a permanent arrangement ~$24/mo, potentially more as we expand

The baseline monthly cost of this infrastructure is approximately $125. A realistic operating target, accounting for the premium charged by providers that accept crypto payments, and for the likelihood that costs increase over time, is $150 to $200 per month. Spread across the active membership of this community, that is a very small amount per person.

To date, the community contribution toward that figure is $10.

3. The broader problem: Free tools and the people who build them

Hunter's Toolbox is not alone in facing this problem. It is, in fact, one of the most well-documented and persistent challenges in the world of free, community-built software.

The pattern repeats constantly across the internet: one person, or a very small group, builds something useful. The community adopts it enthusiastically. The tool becomes reliable enough that people stop thinking about the fact that someone has to maintain it. It becomes invisible, like a road, electricity, or a street light. People use it every day without considering what keeps it working.

Meanwhile, the person maintaining it continues to invest their time, often their money, and in many cases their mental health, quietly, without recognition, while the community that depends on their work goes about its day.

This is sometimes called the "tragedy of the commons": a situation where a shared resource is consumed by everyone but maintained by no one, until eventually it degrades or disappears. It is not caused by malice. It is caused by the very human tendency to assume that someone else is handling it, or that something which has always been there will simply continue to be.

The consequences of this pattern are not theoretical. They are documented, they are serious, and they have affected millions of people who never knew the name of the tool they depended on.

4. What happens when this goes wrong — Real world examples

Case Study: left-pad · 2016

left-pad was a piece of software so small it could fit on a single page. Its entire purpose was to add spaces to the left side of text — a simple formatting function that thousands of major applications quietly relied upon.

It was maintained by one person. A volunteer. He had been doing it alone, without pay, for years. One day, after a dispute with a large technology company, he was frustrated and burned out. He deleted the project.

Within hours, some of the most visited websites in the world stopped working. Facebook, Netflix, Spotify, Airbnb, all broken. Thousands of development teams scrambled. The entire internet software community was in crisis over the absence of eleven lines of code maintained by one unsupported person who had simply reached his limit.

Recovery took hours of frantic work across the industry. The damage was real. And it happened because a community of millions had allowed critical infrastructure to rest entirely on the shoulders of one volunteer, with nothing offered in return.

Case Study: Heartbleed · 2014

OpenSSL is the encryption layer that protects an enormous portion of the internet. Every time a browser shows a padlock indicating a secure connection, there is a very good chance OpenSSL is part of what makes that true. Banks, hospitals, government systems, email... it runs quietly underneath all of it.

In 2014, a vulnerability called Heartbleed was discovered in OpenSSL. It exposed a flaw that allowed attackers to read protected memory on affected servers: passwords, private keys, personal data, without leaving any trace. At the time of disclosure, it affected an estimated two thirds of all secure websites on the internet. The response was one of the largest emergency patching efforts in the history of the web. Most people who were online at the time remember being told to change all of their passwords immediately, across every service they used.

In the aftermath, journalists and researchers asked the obvious question: who maintains OpenSSL? Who is responsible for the security of something this critical, used by this many people, holding up this much of the internet?

The answer was staggering. At the time of the Heartbleed disclosure, the OpenSSL project was receiving approximately $2,000 per year in donations. The encryption infrastructure underpinning the financial data, medical records, and private communications of hundreds of millions of people was being maintained by a handful of volunteers, largely alone, largely unrecognised, and almost entirely unfunded — while the companies and communities that depended on their work treated it as a permanent given.

Heartbleed did not happen because the OpenSSL team was careless. It happened because they were under-resourced, under-supported, and invisible... Right up until the moment they weren't.

Hunter's Toolbox helps handle wallet security for this community. It checks your approvals against live threat databases. It guides you through processes that, done incorrectly, can result in the loss of real funds. It is maintained by one person, with no funding. The parallel is not made lightly.

5. What has already been tried

The sustainability problem has not been raised once and then escalated immediately. Every reasonable avenue has been explored, over an extended period of time, before reaching the point this page represents. The following is a complete account of what has been attempted:

The total community response to all of the above, in financial terms, has been $0.

This page, and the notice on the main Toolbox page, represent the final step before consequential action is taken.

6. What a maintenance freeze means

Effective upon the publication of this notice, no further development or routine maintenance will be undertaken on Hunter's Toolbox until a clear and sustained shift toward community sustainability is demonstrated.

A maintenance freeze means the following, specifically:

The tools will remain accessible in their current state. They will not be taken offline at this time. But without maintenance, they will degrade. Endpoints will go stale. Compatibility will erode. Security data will fall out of date. The experience of using them will worsen gradually and then, at some point, significantly. Eventually, a choice will have to be made to take the tools down entirely.

This is not a decision made out of malice, frustration, or a desire to cause disruption. It is a decision made out of necessity. I will not become the next left-pad: A maintainer who disappears one day and leaves the community scrambling. A controlled, announced freeze is the responsible alternative to a sudden, unmanaged collapse.

7. A note to the Executive team

This section is written directly to the members of the official Pool Funding Executive/Onboarding team. The support staff who use Hunter's Toolbox as part of their daily workflow.

I want to be clear about something before anything else: this situation is not directed at you, and you are not the cause of it. The rapport we have built, the work we have done alongside one another, and the trust that exists between us are things I value genuinely and without reservation.

I am also acutely aware that a maintenance freeze on the Toolbox will affect you directly and practically. The token importer, the RPC switcher, the security scanner, the calculator... These are tools you reach for during support calls, during onboarding, and during outages. Their degradation will make your work harder. That is not something I take lightly, and it is not an outcome I wanted to arrive at. Indeed, you and your workload are never far from my heart.

I have raised the sustainability issue through every channel available to me over an extended period of time. I have documented the cost, explained the risk, made the case in writing and in person, and given the community every opportunity to respond before reaching this point. I regret that it has come this far.

There is still time to change the outcome. If the platform is willing to engage directly on the question of sustainability — whether through community-driven support, or another solution — I am open to that conversation. This freeze is a response to inaction, not a closed door.

I hope that conversation happens. In the meantime, I want you to know that my respect for the work you do, and for each of you personally, has not changed.

— Hunter Rodriguez

8. What you can do

If you have read this far, you understand the situation. The question now is whether enough members of this community are willing to act on that understanding.

The most direct thing you can do is contribute financially. A sponsorship through the community marketplace is the clearest signal of support. It is a deliberate, visible act that demonstrates the Toolbox is worth sustaining. Donations through the Toolbox itself are equally welcome.

There is no minimum. There is no expectation. There is only the straightforward reality that a tool used by this community every day requires something in return to continue existing in good health.

If financial support is not possible, sharing this page or the Toolbox itself with community members who may not be aware of the situation is also a meaningful contribution.